FeatureWish vs Savio: a public voting board vs a private feedback vault
This is the one comparison on this site that isn't apples-to-apples. Savio aggregates feedback privately from your support stack; FeatureWish collects it publicly from your users. Start by deciding which problem you have.
Pricing & features last reviewed July 2026.
Most pages in this compare section pit FeatureWish against tools that do the same job. Savio isn’t quite that, and pretending otherwise wouldn’t help you.
Savio is a feedback vault. Its center of gravity is private: your support, sales, and success teams push customer feedback in from Intercom, Zendesk, Help Scout, HubSpot, and Salesforce; product managers triage it, link it to revenue data, and build evidence-based roadmaps. Voting boards exist in Savio, but they’re a feature at the edge, not the core.
FeatureWish is a feedback board. Its center of gravity is public: your users post, vote, and comment in the open; the roadmap and changelog publish themselves from post status; the loop closes with automatic emails when things ship.
So the real question isn’t “which is better” — it’s which problem you have. Here’s the honest comparison, starting there.
The short version
| FeatureWish | Savio | |
|---|---|---|
| Core model | Public voting board + roadmap + changelog | Private feedback vault from support/CRM channels |
| Free plan | Yes, forever | No — 14-day trial |
| Cheapest paid plan | $20/mo flat (Pro) | $39/mo (1 seat; +$23/mo per extra seat) |
| Pricing model | Flat — never per seat or per user | Per seat |
| Team members | Unlimited, free | Paid per seat (free browse-only users) |
| Public voting board | Core, free | Included, secondary |
| Public roadmap | Free, auto-generated | Roadmaps: 1 on Essential, 5 on Professional |
| Changelog | Free | — |
| Embeddable widget | Free (script + iframe, themeable) | Feedback forms |
| Support-channel capture (Intercom, Zendesk, Help Scout) | — | Core strength |
| CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | — | Professional/Business plans |
| Revenue-weighted prioritization (MRR per request) | — | Core strength |
| Customer segmentation | — | Professional ($79/mo) |
| Duplicate suggestions (as you type) | Yes, free | — |
| Vote integrity (verified voting, abuse signals) | Yes | — |
| MCP server (AI agents) | $20/mo flat (Pro) | — (REST API on Professional+) |
Savio facts reflect their public plans at the time of writing (July 2026): no free tier; Essential at $39/mo (1 paid seat, +$23/mo each additional), Professional at $79/mo (+$39/seat — adds segmentation, Jira/Zendesk, API), Business at $249/mo (+$49/seat — adds HubSpot/Salesforce), all with unlimited free browse-only users. Check savio.io/pricing for current numbers before you decide.
Which problem do you have?
You have the Savio problem if: you’re a B2B SaaS with a support inbox and a sales team, feedback arrives as fragments inside Intercom threads and lost Slack messages, and your real pain is centralizing it — knowing that eleven customers worth $4,300 MRR asked for the same thing. Your users may never see a public board at all, and that’s fine.
You have the FeatureWish problem if: you want your users to do the organizing — post requests in public, vote on each other’s ideas, see a roadmap that tells them you’re listening, and get an email when their request ships. The value is the open loop itself: less repeated support load, visible momentum, users who feel heard.
Plenty of companies eventually want both. But almost every small SaaS team starts with the second problem, because before you have a sales team routing feedback, you have users you want to hear from — and for that problem, paying $39–$249/month per-seat for a vault is the wrong shape of tool.
The pricing shapes are opposites
Savio prices like the B2B tool it is: per seat. $39/month gets one paid user; every teammate who triages costs $23–$49/month more depending on tier. For a product whose value grows with how many teammates engage with feedback, seats are the pressure point — a five-person team on Professional is $79 + 4×$39 = $235/month.
FeatureWish is flat in both directions: unlimited team members and unlimited tracked users on the free plan, and the only paid plan is $20/month total — not per anything. The whole point of the pricing is that neither your team growing nor your audience growing ever raises the bill.
What you get with FeatureWish
- The public loop, free forever. Boards, voting, threaded comments, an auto-generated public roadmap, and a changelog — the pieces Savio treats as secondary are the whole product here, and they’re $0 with no trial clock.
- A changelog that closes the loop. Ship something, publish the entry, and voters on the request get an email automatically. Savio doesn’t do changelogs; this is where public feedback pays for itself in reduced “any update on this?” tickets.
- Embeddable everywhere. A script tag for a floating feedback popup, or iframes for inline board/roadmap/changelog — theme-aware and deliberately neutral, with a first-party token bridge so voter identity survives Safari and Firefox’s third-party storage restrictions.
- Duplicate suggestions as users type, so the board self-organizes instead of filling with restated requests — plus manual merge with vote-carryover for the rest.
- Vote integrity built in. Salted IP-hash signals on every vote and opt-in email-verified voting per board — public boards invite gaming; FeatureWish accounts for that.
- An SEO-ready portal. Public pages are server-rendered with real meta tags and a sitemap. A public board is content; Savio’s vault, by design, is invisible.
What about AI agents and MCP?
Savio offers a REST API on Professional and above — good raw material, but you’d be writing and maintaining your own bridge to use it from an AI tool. At the time of writing, Savio doesn’t ship an MCP server.
FeatureWish’s MCP server is built in on the flat $20/month Pro plan: seven scoped tools — list boards and posts, read a request with its full comment thread, pull the roadmap and changelog, file a post, update a status (which emails the voters) — behind one revocable token. Interestingly, this covers a slice of what Savio sells: your agent can file feedback from anywhere (paste a support email into Claude, ask it to log the request on the board) and triage it against real vote counts — a lightweight version of the centralize-and-prioritize workflow, at a fraction of the price. Setup on the MCP server page; workflows on FeatureWish for AI agents.
Where Savio is the better choice
Genuinely — and for its target customer, decisively:
- Feedback lives in your support stack. Savio’s one-click capture from Intercom, Zendesk, and Help Scout conversations — with the customer and their account attached — is the core product and it’s excellent. FeatureWish has nothing like it.
- Revenue-weighted prioritization. Savio ties requests to MRR and account data (HubSpot/Salesforce on Business), so “should we build this?” comes with a dollar figure. If your roadmap decisions hinge on revenue evidence, that’s Savio’s home turf.
- Feedback should stay private. Some B2B companies don’t want competitors reading their feature-request queue. Savio is private by default; FeatureWish’s superpowers are public by design.
- Customer segmentation. Cut feedback by plan, ARR band, or lifecycle stage (Professional+). FeatureWish doesn’t segment.
If you read those four and nodded, buy Savio — FeatureWish won’t solve your problem.
Can you switch between them?
Less directly than between two board tools — Savio’s vault data (sources, account links, MRR) has no FeatureWish equivalent, and FeatureWish’s public history has none in Savio. The realistic path is starting with the right one: if you’re early and your feedback should be public, start free on FeatureWish; if you later grow a sales-and-support machine that needs a vault, add one then.
Bottom line
Savio is a strong tool for a specific, real problem: centralizing B2B feedback from support and sales channels and weighing it by revenue. If that’s your problem, it’s worth its per-seat price. But if what you want is a public feedback board with voting, a roadmap, and a changelog — the thing your users actually see — FeatureWish does all of it free forever, with unlimited teammates, and $20/month flat for the white-label and MCP extras.
Put up a free board and find out what your users would tell you — no card, no per-seat math.